Caution: JavaScript execution is disabled in your browser or for this website. You may not be able to answer all questions in this survey. Please, verify your browser parameters.

10 Commandments for the Wise and Responsible Use of AI

Anonymous expert feedback survey on the proposed 10 Commandments for the Wise and Responsible Use of AI.
We are seeking your expert feedback on the proposed set of 10 commandments. At the end, you can optionally share your contact details if you would like to receive results or participate in a follow-up. By continuing, you consent to participate in this study.
There are 17 questions in this survey.
This survey is anonymous.

The record of your survey responses does not contain any identifying information about you, unless a specific survey question explicitly asked for it.

If you used an identifying access code to access this survey, please rest assured that this code will not be stored together with your responses. It is managed in a separate database and will only be updated to indicate whether you did (or did not) complete this survey. There is no way of matching identification access codes with survey responses.

Discipline

Which discipline best describes your primary background?

Have you read the paper “It’s Not the AI - It’s Us! introducing the 10 Commandments for the Wise and Responsible Use of AI?”
Relevance of the 10 Commandments
How relevant do you consider this commandment to responsible AI research and practice? Rate the Relevance of each commandment on a scale from 1 (not relevant at all) to 5 (very relevant).

1. Adopt AI Consciously and Deliberately

Use AI with intention: Why is it needed? What does it enable and/or replace? Does it truly act in humans’ interest? Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

2. Protect Human Capabilities

Preserve critical thinking, empathy, and creativity through continuous learning and reflective practice, resisting the comfort of outsourcing to AI too much too fast. Striving for convenience risks reducing our curiosity and independent thought. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

3. Foster Human Development Through Early and Mindful AI Engagement

Engage with AI intentionally from an early stage to cultivate curiosity, empathy, and digital literacy. Technology shall support and strengthen humanity. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

4. Leverage AI as a Learning Partner

Treat AI as a collaborator in thought, not a source of authority. Use it to think deeper and pose better questions, not just to get faster answers. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

5. Clarify Responsibility and Validate Before Acting

Keep accountability human. Treat every AI output as a proposal, not a decision. Validate its reasoning, context, and ethical implications before implementation. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

6. Make the Use of AI Visible and Discussable

Clarify the role of AI in any decision or creation. Openness strengthens fairness and public trust. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

7. Prioritize Meaning over Efficiency

Value insight and understanding over speed or productivity: the fastest solution is rarely the best. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

8. Promote Fairness and Inclusivity

Recognize and correct biases to ensure that AI benefits all members of society. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

9. Safeguard Privacy and Data Security

Protect personal data, particularly that of vulnerable groups. Consent, confidentiality, and protection are moral imperatives. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

10. Commit to Oversight and Continuous Learning

Evaluate AI’s impact regularly and adapt practices as understanding grows. Responsible AI evolves with human wisdom. Rate relevance (1 = not relevant at all, 5 = very relevant).

Prioritization: If you had to prioritize, which 2–3 commandments have the most impact? Why?
Missing elements: Are any important aspects missing (e.g., scope, safeguards, implementation guidance)? If yes, what would you add or clarify?
Further feedback / ideas: Do you have suggestions to improve wording or applicability?
Contact Details (Optional; leave blank to remain anonymous)
Name
Email
 
Close